The Liquidity Cockpit has evolved thanks to continuous feedback from our clients and we are delighted to be adding to the content with a brand new Enterprise section to the menu. Our Enterprise Plan allows for unlimited dashboards. Furthermore this plan gives access to the full flexibility of the API with our technical support for its use and for integration with visualisation tools. As an example, these can be used to create custom views & dashboards for your regular or bespoke use.
We saw how volatility during February and March resulted in an unsurprising widening of equity spreads. It sparked our curiosity to see how ETFs were affected during the same period. Market makers in ETFs base their pricing on the underlying instruments. These instruments are not limited to cash equities and may be structured to provide investors with exposure to baskets of Fixed Income instruments or Commodities as well as cash equities. The chart today shows ETF spreads grouped by underlying asset class (Equities, Fixed Income & Commodities) for around 2500 instruments quoted on Euronext Paris, one of the largest & most liquid European venues. We were struck by two notable observations. Firstly, that whilst spreads in Cash Equity, & Commodity based ETFs increased to a peak of around 4 times their normal levels, the Fixed Income based ETFs saw their spreads widened by a factor of 10 at the peak.
April market volumes reverted to long term average levels following the record month of March 2020. ADVT traded on the order books in European equities was 47B€, compared with 44 B€ ADVT for the full year 2019. Accompanying this apparent return to normality, the proportion of value traded in each of the three main categories of On Order book trading also resumed to their pre-crisis average. Lit Continuous volumes fell from nearly 71% of On Order Book trading back to 68%, returning market share to the Auctions and Dark Trading. Volumes are perhaps the most discussed measure of the evolution of the market, but we need to go much deeper to get a sense of whether things are returning to normal. For example, looking at trading in the most liquid names on the LSE order book, we see that liquidity available (or ‘book depth’) at up to 10bps from the touch fell over 75% from 80k€ to less than 20K€ and has still only recovered to around 30K€. The picture is similar at all order book depth in most indexes, and it’s a good reminder that volume doesn’t equal liquidity. See the chart below.
Following a bumper month for European Equity trading volumes during the Great Sell Off it seems that we may be reverting to type. Daily traded value broke through the four year record high of 148 B€ on no less than 7 days, peaking at a little under 180 B€. Then the March ADV of 120 B€ fell to just 77 B€ ADV in April, slightly above the average of 73 B€ for the full year of 2018 (67 B€ for 2019). This rally is based on much lower volumes than the crash, which are rapidly approaching the ever-decreasing long term average. Perhaps investors are not as convinced as prices imply, or maybe there is more cash to come back into the market to sustain its ascent. It would be more comforting to see a rally with some decent volumes behind it. Buyer beware.
For four hours on Tuesday liquidity dried up on the primary market in Germany (plus some other XETRA powered markets) due to a technical outage. Not for the first time we observed the importance of the primary exchange in a fragmented marketplace. The chart shows volume traded on all European venues across 5 minute bins from the opening auction through to the end of continuous trading for German Large Cap Stocks. We can see all trading mechanisms reduced to virtually zero activity when the the primary market is not available. The participants normally active in Dark Pools, Periodic Auctions, competing alternative Lit venues and Systematic Internalisers all lost their appetite for business when their reference prices evaporated.
Recent market volatility has created a domino effect of changing market behaviours as investors struggle to understand changing liquidity patterns. big xyt has received an increasing number of requests from the community for guidance on market quality as the exceptional trading conditions persist. As a result of these enquiries, additional content is being added to the unique Liquidity Cockpit which provides a consolidated view of the European Equity Market landscape.
Following our first post in this series, a number of people have asked if the trend we observed has continued over subsequent days. The ingredients are consistent – uncertainty, volatile markets, and unpredictable liquidity leading to opportunity cost with other less immediate execution pathways. It is no real surprise to see lit markets continue to maintain market share at the expense of all other mechanisms. At big-xyt we can provide daily volume curves for users and algo developers in 12,000 instruments and all significant venues, as well as many other essential trading metrics. If you are interested in letting us do some of the heavy lifting for your algo infrastructure please get in touch.
It is not news to anyone that trading volumes have simply exploded this month to record levels. We put some eye watering facts and figures on this in a historical context and look at one surprising finding; the distribution of volumes throughout the trading day has hardly changed at all. Do we detect the cool hand of trading algorithms behind this remarkable observation ? We ask some questions as to why this might be, and reflect on how far we have come with electronic trading. Article We mentioned earlier in the week that volume was returning to the lit order books from other types of trading venue – such as the end of day auctions. Just taking trades executed electronically on lit markets, we find that volumes increased from an
The chart today shows the changing market share of European Equity trading venues during 2020.The highlighted line is the focus of the following observations. Last Summer when Swiss non equivalence was announced, overnight competition from MTFs was outlawed and the SIX Swiss exchange saw a 25% increase in share from 8% to 10% of European equity turnover. Without any legislative announcements, something even more dramatic has transpired since the beginning of February. The same venue has just grown its share by a further 50%. At the beginning of February the Swiss market was the fourth largest European venue by turnover with just under 10% market share.
In this article, we look at the difference in price between two major benchmarks, the Previous Close and the Open – the ‘overnight gap’. The equities market is only open for around 8 hours a day 5 days a week, or just under 24% of the time, leaving 16 hours (more at the weekend) for investors to absorb news from around the world and decide what to do next. The market Open can be thought of as a catch up on price formation. By keeping an eye on the volatility of this gap over time, we get a feel for whether the market is stabilising or destabilising and it can be a useful barometer of whether a consensus is forming. At the moment, there is no sign of that happening.
